Email this article 
Hide
Show all
MUTUAL DEPENDENCE BETWEEN QUALITY MANAGEMENT, KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND INNOVATION PERFORMANCE
Abstract
Abstract
From ancient times, wealth and power have been associated with the possession of physical resources. The traditional factors of material, human, monetary production were predominant of a physical nature. Therefore, the need for knowledge was limited. The industrial revolution of past centuries was predominantly based on human physical strength and money capital.
A significantly different situation is foreseen for the future. Wealth and power in the 21st century will come primarily from intangible intellectual resources, from the capital of knowledge. The knowledge revolution therefore consists precisely in this transition from the economy dominated by physical, tangible resources, to the economy dominated by knowledge. The process is particularly comprehensive and profound, generating essential changes in all components of economic activities, analogous to those produced by the industrial revolution.
We are currently in the early stages of the knowledge revolution. Products and services are more knowledge intensive. Due to this, the delimitation between products and services is becoming more and more difficult. Knowledge tends to become the main feature of activities, more than the resulting products or services. The impact of the knowledge revolution becomes visible in the volatility of the market, the uncertainties regarding the direction of economic activities, the job insecurity felt by people.
Keywords
References
Albu, N., Albu, C., (2003), Instrumente de management al performanţei, vol. I – Contabilitate de gestiune, vol. II - Control de gestiune, Ed. Economică, Bucureşti.
Bell, D. (1973). Technology, nature and society: the vicissitudes of three world views and the confusion of realms. The American Scholar, 385-404.
Bennet, J., ÅŸi Bennet, D, (2004), The Force of Things: Steps toward an Ecology of Matter, First Published June 1, 2004 Research Article, https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591703260853.
Bratianu, C. (2015). Organizational Knowledge Dynamics: Managing Knowledge, Creation, Acquisition, Sharing, and Transformation. Editura IGI Global, Hershey, PA, USA.
Caraiani, C., Dumitrana, M., (2004), Contabilitate ÅŸi control de gestiune, Editura InfoMega, BucureÅŸti, , http://elibrary.snspa.ro/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Managementul-cunostintelor-si-al-proiectelor.pdf
Dragolea, L., L., (2006), Managementul calităţii-funcţii şi principii, accesat la http://www.oeconomica.uab.ro/upload/lucrari/820063/32.pdf.
Giarini, O., şi Maliţa, M., (2005). Dubla spirală a învăţării şi a muncii. Bucureşti: Editura Comunicare.ro.
https://cdn.edupedu.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/ME-audit-anonimizat.pdf
https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/statistics/performance-indicators/european-innovation-scoreboard_ro
https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/strategy/support-policy-making/support-national-research-and-innovation-policy-making/transitions-performance-index-tpi_ro
https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/ro/newsroom/news/2019/06/17-06-2019-2019-innovation-scoreboards-the-innovation-performance-of-the-eu-and-its-regions-is-increasing.
https://european-union.europa.eu/priorities-and-actions/actions-topic/research-and-innovation_ro.
https://kmeducationhub.de/international-knowledge-management-institute-km-institute/.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Constantin-Bratianu/publication/306866415_Managementul_cunostintelor_Concepte_fundamentale/links/5a42cefa458515f6b04fd8b7/Managementul-cunostintelor-Concepte-fundamentale.pdf,
https://www.revistadestatistica.ro/supliment/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/rrss_10_2019_A5_ro.pdf
Lahey, L. and Prusak, L. (1998) The Eleven Deadliest Sins of Knowledge Management. California Management Review, 40, 265-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41165954.
Lave, J., Etienne W., 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 33, 29, 40.
Leon, R., D., Managementul cunoştinţelor si al proiectelor – pilonii unei organizații durabile, editura Tritonic, 2014, ISBN: 978-606-8571-93-5.
Liebowitz, J., 2012, Knowledge Management Handbook: Collaboration and Social Networking,
Moorman, C., & Miner, A. S. (1998). Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. The Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 698–723. https://doi.org/10.2307/259058.
Nicolescu & Nicolescu, 2005; Nicolescu & Nicolescu, 2011, Dictionar de management, Pro UniversitariaISBN: 978-973-129-882-5,
Nonaka, I., & Von Krogh, G. (2009). Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory. Organization Science, 20(3), 635-652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0412.
Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H. (eds.), Hitotsubashi on knowledge management. Asia, Wiley, 2004,
Skyrme, D. Developing A Knowledge Strategy. 2002 [cited 28/2/2006]; Available from: http://www.skyrme.com/pubs/knwstrat.htm.
Stănescu, S., M., 2009, Abordarea conceptuală a inovaţiei în contextul relansării strategiei de la lisabona, Calitatea Vietii XX (1-2):19-27, accesat la https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296722657_ABORDAREA_CONCEPTUALA_A_INOVATIEI_IN_CONTEXTUL_RELANSARII_STRATEGIEI_DE_LA_LISABONA.
Ţîțu, M., “Managementul calităţii în organizaÅ£iile industriale moderneâ€, Teză de doctorat, Sibiu, (2007), https://doctorate.ulbsibiu.ro/wp-content/uploads/REZ-TITU.pdf
Toma, S. G. and Naruo, S., 2017. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence: The Best Practices at Toyota Motor Corporation. Amfiteatru Economic, 19(45), pp. 566-580.
Toma, S., G., 2019, Learning from the Asian Tigers: lessons in economic growth, Annals-Economy Series, p. 63-69.
Vătășoiu, C., I., Ghoerghe, M., Motoniu, I., D., Boca, I., S., Informaţia contabilă – baza analizei financiare in deciziile de investiţii, Analele Universităţii “Constantin Brâncuşi†din Târgu Jiu, Seria Economie, Nr. 4/2010.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.