The Impacts of Inward and Outward FDI on Income Inequality in Turkey and Selected Turkic Republics

Hasret Balcioglu

Abstract


This study investigates the effects of inward and outward FDI on income inequality in Turkey, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. The methodology covers panel cointegration techniques and balanced panel regressions. The conclusion is that inward and outward FDI have averagely a negative impact on income inequality in the long-run period but on the other hand the short-run effect of inward and outward FDI on income inequality is positive. The conclusion is robust to using different methods for estimation, sample selection and controlling for potential outliers.


Keywords


Balanced Panel Regressions; FDI; Income Inequality; Turkic Republics; Turkey

References


Arellano, M. and Bond, S. (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations, Review of Economic Studies, 58, pp.277-297.

Arnold, I. J. M. and Roelands, S. (2010) The demand for Euros, Journal of Macroeconomics, 32, pp. 674-684.

Arndt, S. W. (1997) Globalization and the open economy, North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 8, pp.71-79.

Aslund, A. (2001) Transforming Post Communist Political Economies: Possible Future Directions for Economies in Transition, www.nap.edu.readingroom/books/transform/ch18htm.

Balcioglu, H. (2016) ), Foreign Aid and Economic Growth: A Panel Cointegration for Selected Turkic Republics, International Journal of Business and Social Research, Vol.6, no. 6, 17-23

Becker, S. O., Eckholm, K., Jackle, R. and Muendler, M. A. (2005) Elocation choice and employment decisions: A comparison of German and Swedish multinationals, Review of World Economics, 14, pp. 693-731.

Breitung, J. (2000) The local power of some unit root tests for panel data, Advances in Econometrics, 15, pp.161-178.

Breitung, J. (2005) A parametric approach to the estimation of cointegration vectors in panel data, Econometric Reviews, 24, pp. 151-173.

Chintrakarn, P., Herzer, D. and Nunnenkamp, P. (2012) FDI and Income Inequality:Evidence from a Panel of US States., Economic Inquiry, 50, pp. 788-801.

data.worldbank.or

Feenstra, R. C. and Hanson, G. H. (1997) Foreign direct investment and relative wages: Evidence from Mexico’s maquiladoras, Journal of International Economics, 42, pp. 371-393.

Figini, P. and Görg, H. (2011) Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Wage Inequality? An Empirical Investigation, World Economy, 34, pp. 1455-1475.

Galbraith, J. K. and Kum, H. (2005) Estimating the inequality of household incomes: a statistical approach to the creation of a dense and consistent global data set, Review of Income and Wealth, 51, pp.115-143.

Gouliev, R. (1997) Petrol and Policy, Ar Publication Office, Istanbul.

Herzer, D. (2008) The long-run relationship between outward FDI and domestic output: Evidence from panel data, Economics Letters, 100, pp.146-149.

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/appendix/appendix-b.html#D

IMF Advanced Economies List. (2011) World Economic Outlook, April, p. 173.

Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H. and Shin, Y. (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels, Journal of Econometrics, 115, pp. 53-74.

Irvin, G. and Izurieta, A. (2000) Will the growing trade gap sink Vietnam? Some exploratory econometrics, Journal of International Development, 12, pp. 169-186.

Johansen, S. (1988) Statistical analysis of cointegrating vectors, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. 12, pp. 231-254.

Kao, C. and Chiang, M. H., (2000) On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data, Advances in Econometrics, 15, pp.179-222.

Larsson, R., Lyhagen, J. and Löthegren, M. (2001) Likelihood-based cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels, Econometrics Journal. 4, pp 109-142.

Lipsey, R. E. (2002) Home and host country effects of FDI, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper 9293, Cambridge, MA.

Levin, A., Lin , C. and Chu S. J. (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asympototic and finite-sample properties, Joournal of Econometrics, 108, pp.1-24.

MacKinnon, J. G., Haug, A. and Michelis, L. (1999) Numerical distribution functions of likelihood ratio tests for cointegration, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 14, pp. 563-577.

Madalla, G. S. and Wu S. (1999) A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 6, pp. 631-652.

Marin, D. (2004) A nation of poets and thinkers-less so with Eastern enlargement? Austria and Germany, Centre for Economic Policy Research, Discussion paper 4358, London.

Melo, M. D., Denizer, C. and Tenev S. (1997) The Role of Initial Conditions and Policies in Transition Economies, Wb, IFC, WP.

Nunnenkamp, P., Schweickert R. and Wiebelt M. (2008) Distributional Effects of FDI: How the Interaction of FDI and Economic Policy Affects Poor Households in Bolivia, Kiel Institute for the World Economy at http://www.pegnet.ifw-kiel.de/conference-2008-paper/Wiebelt.pdf.

utip.gov.utexas.edu/data.html

Van der Leeuw, C. (1997) Oil in Azerbaijan-Black Gold and Vile Poison, Caucasus and Unholy Alliance (Edited by Antero Leitzinger), pp. 307-314.

World Investment Report, 2013


Full Text: PDF

Comments on this article

View all comments


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.