THE IMPACT OF STANDARDIZATION ON OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE IN A NETWORKED GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN: A CASE STUDY

Joel D. Bigley

Abstract


Standardization reduces complexity and increases predictability in a global supply chain. This predictability can be exploited for capacity management and resource allocation to meet client demands and achieve cost expectations. On this foundation of predictability a supply chain can expand, take on new workflows, and update technology. Best practices must be developed and be made known across the supply chain. Adoption of best practices must be expedient and effective to satisfy a changing business environment. Where complexity and chaos are reduced profitability can be more accurately predicted. A performance understanding and supply chain predictability can also aid with organizational change success increasing the assurance that transitions will be successful. Conversely, chaos and complexity management challenges also directly relate to liability and the ability of the organization to mitigate risk threats.


Keywords


Best Practices; Leadership; Predictability; Scaling; Standardization

References


Burns, T. & Stalker, G. M. (1992). Mechanistic and organic systems. In J. M. Shafritz & J. S. Ott (Eds.), Classics of organizational theory (3rd ed., pp. 207-211). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.

Campbell, A. & Goold, M. (2000). The collaborative enterprise: Why links between business units often fail and how to make them work. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Clipa, C. I., & Clipa, A. M. (2017). The Convergence of Strategic Human Resource Management Practices: Republic of Moldova and European Union. Ecoforum Journal, 6(3).

Davis, R. & Thomas, L. G. (1993). Direct estimation of synergy, a new approach to the diversity-performance debate. Management Science, 39(11), 1334-1346.

Eisenhardt, K. M. & Bharia, M. M. (2002). Organization computation and complexity. In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), Companion to Organizations. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Freeman, W. J. (2000). How brains make up their minds. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Galbraith, J. R. (2009). Designing matrix organizations that actually work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109-122.

Ionescu, G. H., & Vilag, R. D. (2015). Risk management, corporate governance and sustainable development. Ecoforum Journal, 4.

Kotter, J. P. & Heskett, J. L. (1992). Corporate culture and performance. New York, NY: The Free Press.

Loomer, S. & Harington, A. (2003). Business valuation-sharing synergies: Ignoring or over-estimating them is a disservice to vendors and acquirers. CA Magazine-Chartered Accountant, 136(4), 41-42.

Markides, C. C. & Williamson, P. J. (1994). Related diversification, core competencies and corporate performance. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 149-165.

Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York, NY: Free Press.

Scurtu, L. E. (2015). Knowledge and Their Shelf Life in the Business Cycle. Ecoforum Journal, 4.

Strikwerda, J. J. & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2009). The Emergence and Evolution of the Multidimensional Organization. California Management Review, 51(4), 11-31.

Zhou, Y. M. (2011). Synergy, coordination costs, and diversification choices. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 624-639.


Full Text: PDF

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.