EMPLOYMENT LEVEL ANALYSIS FROM THE DETERMINANT FACTORS PERSPECTIVE

Elena Diana ŞERB, Nicoleta CICIOC, Maria PĂUN, Constanţa FUNIERU

Abstract


Neglecting the human factor as part of the labor market causes losses for society as any activity that is initiated within it, has as a starting point, and also as a finishing point, the human intervention. The starting point of the article is represented by the projections made by the European    Commission in the Population Ageing Report in 2015 underlying assumptions and projections, and also by the projections of the United Nations report in 2015, and this resulted in many conclusions including the one that for the first time in Romania the average aging in 2015 exceeds the values measured by EU till present day, and this is reflected in the employment level (active aging population). The hypothesis behind the article is that the evolution of the population and migrants has repercussions on employment. Structured in three parts: knowledge status, the analysis of employment indicators and information about the intensity and direction of the link between a number of factors and employment level, this article aims to establish the determinant factors of employment through a research focused on the analysis of secondary sources, and also using the regression model. The most important lesson learned as a result of this research is that the labor market works with a variety of factors with a higher or lower influence, and in turn the labor market influences other factors.


Keywords


labor demand; labor supply; employment level; employment policies

References


 Cojocaru R,Borovină C(2014), Finance – Challenges of the Future, Year XIV, No. 16/165;

 Duguleană C(2014), PERMANENT UNEMPLOYMENT, A REFLECTION OF CHANGING

THE BASIC STRUCTURE OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES, Cross-Cultural Management Journal Volume XVI, Issue 2 (6) ;

 Ghiţă T (1992). Şomajul [Unemployment]. Bucharest: Editura Politică;

 Krueger B(2014) , Are the Long-Term Unemployed on the Margins of the Labor Market? Princeton UniversityDavid Cho, Princeton University Final conference, Brookings Panel on Economic ActivityMarch 20–21, p 34;

 Manafi I(2012), The Impact of the Europe 2020 Strategy on Romanian Labour Market, International Journal of Economic Practices and Theories, Vol. 2, No. 4, (October);

 Mărginean I(2002), Semnificaţia cercetărilor de calitatea vieţii, în Calitatea Vieţii în România (coord.: Mărginean, I., Bălaşa, A.), Editura Expert, Bucureşti, pp 55-57;

 Mocanu I(2011), THE JOB EXCHANGES FOR GRADUATES IN ROMANIA – THE ASSESSMENT OF THE TERRITORIAL DISPARITIES, Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis, vol. III, 2, p.159-174;

 Nica, E. (2007). Strategii şi politici de ocupare a forţei de muncă în România [Strategies and

policies of employing labor force in Romania]. Bucharest: Editura Economică;

 Pârâianu, M. (2003). Piaţa paralelă a muncii [Parallel labor market]. Bucharest: Expert.

 Popescu C(2009), Economie, Ed. Bibliotheca, p 155;

 Tudose G, Ţoţan Ş, Cristache E(2013),Models for the analysis of the labor market in Romania, Theoretical and Applied Economics Volume XX No. 4(581), pp. 113-122;

 Wilson R. (2008). “Modelling and Forecasting the Structure of Employment in the United;

 http://www.mmuncii.ro/j33/index.php/ro/legislatie/munca/mobilitatea-fortei-de-munca/7:legislatie-interna/;

 http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home/;

 http://www.insse.ro/cms/;

 http://beta.ier.ro/documente/formare/Piata_muncii.pdf


Full Text: PDF

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.